Four Years Later, I Can Finally Finish My Speech

Four Years Later, I Can Finally Finish My Speech

My name is Carolyn Burjoski, and I am a veteran elementary school teacher.  Four years ago today, at a school board meeting, I raised concerns about a library book that downplays serious medical interventions on children who identify as transgender. I was kicked out of the meeting, removed from my classroom, threatened with disciplinary action, and accused of transphobia. I launched a defamation lawsuit against the Board. 

I am deeply grateful to the hundreds of supporters who stood with me through this difficult legal battle. Together, we achieved two court victories at the Divisional Court and the Ontario Court of Appeal. Our Anti-SLAPP victory now stands as a legal precedent. The lawsuit has now been settled. This chapter is finally closed.

Today, I want to finish what I began four years ago and sound the alarm about what children are being taught in Ontario schools. I believe we may be living through one of the most serious medical scandals in modern history, and our public schools are complicit. I will lay out the facts and let you draw your own conclusions. 

My concerns began nearly ten years ago, when a new picture book in our elementary school library introduced very young children to the idea that they can be born in the wrong body. As a teacher with extensive experience working with young children, I found this troubling. Children think literally. They do not yet understand how their bodies work. When trusted adults suggest that a child’s body can be wrong, some children will inevitably wonder: Is my body wrong too?

That book was written by the star of the television series I Am Jazz, which documents the social transition of a preschool-aged child. Social transition is a powerful psychosocial intervention in which adults use opposite-sex names and language to reinforce a child’s belief that their body is wrong. For many children, this belief becomes fixed and leads the child down a pathway toward irreversible medical interventions 1. In Jazz Jennings’ case, that pathway included penile inversion surgery at seventeen, followed by corrective procedures and struggles with an eating disorder.

To me, this wasn’t the simple happy ending that Jazz and so many other children are promised when they are socially transitioned. Jazz’s painful experience should have prompted serious reflection within medical and educational institutions. Instead, professionals who urged caution were often smeared as transphobic and dismissed2, and meaningful questions went unheard. Even Jennings’ own surgeon later acknowledged3 the need for greater caution, noting that these interventions can result in lifelong sexual dysfunction and sterility.

That same call for caution was echoed by Dr. Hilary Cass, who led a four-year independent review of pediatric gender medicine in the United Kingdom. Her final report concluded that the evidence base, particularly for puberty blockers, is weak, inconsistent, and lacks long-term follow-up data. Following this review, the UK restricted the use of puberty blockers, and several European countries shifted toward a more cautious approach4.

Around the same time, a video of a private meeting of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) was leaked to the public. This international group publishes guidelines that set the policies of major medical groups, lawmakers, judges and insurance providers around the world.

The leaked video5 from WPATH showed gender clinicians acknowledging that children cannot fully comprehend or consent to the long-term consequences6 of these medical interventions. These admissions caused many professionals to question the ethics7 of current practice. Shortly afterward, fourteen Canadian physicians publicly stated8, “The science is not ‘settled’ by any means. So-called ‘gender-affirming care’ has proven risks and harms, but unproven benefits. It is not ‘life-saving,’ it is permanently life-altering.” 

What do these Canadian physicians mean by the term “permanently life-altering” and in what ways might the school system be complicit in creating these conditions? Let me tell you what I was seeing in schools, which caused me enough concern to speak out at the school board in 2022.

In an effort to be supportive, schools adopted policies intended to make gender-questioning children feel “safe,” including strict language directives for teachers. We were shown charts instructing us to avoid basic words, such as boys, girls, men, women, male and female. One colleague confided in me that she struggled to teach the puberty unit without using the word girl. She considered saying, “people with uteruses will get a period,” before realizing that she could not explain who has a uterus without using words like girl, female or woman.

At the same time, schools and libraries increasingly promoted materials that present gender change as self-declared and straightforward. I felt that this confusing learning environment could lead girls to believe that all they have to do is say, “I’m a boy,” and – like magic – it’s done!” When a girl says she is a boy, teachers immediately celebrate the child’s bravery, affirm the new identity, change names and pronouns and grant access to bathrooms and change rooms accordingly. In most school boards, teachers are also instructed not to inform parents of a child’s social transition without the child’s consent. In practice, this meant that the teacher would use the child’s chosen name and pronoun at school, unless the parents were there for interviews, in which case the teacher would switch back to the birth name and pronoun that the parents would expect to hear. Several colleagues told me privately that they were uncomfortable with this secrecy but felt coerced into compliance. I worried that I would soon find myself caught in this ethical dilemma. I also wondered how it would affect a student’s psyche to be treated as a girl at home and a boy with a different name at school.

By placing teachers in the role of affirming unexamined gender identity claims and by compelling staff to obscure biological facts, schools may be causing gender confusion in some children, which could lead to poorly considered outcomes. This is problematic because once a child declares a new identity, no adult is permitted to explain that this decision often places them on a path toward lifelong medicalization and probable sterilization. Yet any honest adult knows that children do not always understand the consequences of their choices. 

In fact, the majority of gender-distressed children come to accept their bodies after going through natural puberty9, unless they are socially or medically transitioned beforehand.

Think about that.

These thoughts were weighing heavily on me in late 2021. I had found a children’s book in my school library that makes light of a permanent, life-altering process: the halting of a child’s puberty with powerful drugs, then starting her on cross-sex hormones. I decided to read a passage from that book at a school board meeting. I was stopped before I could finish my presentation. This is what I had wanted to say: Children cannot consent to these medical interventions. They harm reproductive health. And children are too young to understand how that harm will affect their future. Even WPATH admits10 it. That is the point I was trying to make when I was silenced.

What happened to me four years ago was not an isolated incident. Across Canada, parents and educators who raise concerns about these practices face the same response: not engagement, but accusation. Not dialogue, but dismissal. The goal is not to answer the question but to ensure no one else dares to ask it. 

Over the past four years, I have watched many well-intentioned parents try to reform this system from within. I know one parent who contacted the school board, child protection services, the Ontario College of Teachers, and even showed up at the police station one day regarding sexually inappropriate school library books for children. Each institution told him to contact another arm of the government. No one took responsibility. 

This is not a single failure, but a system-wide collapse11 of child-protection safeguards across multiple government institutions. 

While parents have had some effect, they have not been able to fix the root problem: an ideology that intentionally obscures the truth, dignity, and promise inherent in each human being’s physical body.

A system like this cannot be repaired from within. That is why I have come to believe that the meaningful change will require parents to reclaim their rightful role as their child’s primary educator, whether by removing their children from public schools, demanding transparency, or building alternative institutions. From that foundation – family, home, community, and the pursuit of truth – the next generation can grow up into adulthood with a healthy body, a healthy mind, healthy friendships and an open future.

In closing, this message reflects my personal experiences and opinions. I encourage you to explore the footnotes in the article on my website linked below as part of your own research on this important topic.

From the bottom of my heart, thank you for standing with me to protect Canada’s children.

References

Footnotes
  1. newsweek.com/how-can-we-explain-rising-gender-dysphoria-among-girls-opinion-1738260 []
  2. globalnews.ca/news/4530753/former-camh-psychologist-defends-himself-criticism-youth-gender-identity-clinic/ []
  3. bariweiss.substack.com/p/top-trans-doctors-blow-the-whistle []
  4. www.forbes.com/sites/joshuacohen/2023/06/06/increasing-number-of-european-nations-adopt-a-more-cautious-approach-to-gender-affirming-care-among-minors/ []
  5. environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath-files []
  6. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/09/disturbing-leaks-from-us-gender-group-wpath-ring-alarm-bells-in-nhs []
  7. can-sg.org/2024/03/08/wpath-files []
  8. genderreport.ca/the-myth-of-expert-consensus-is-finally-being-challenged-in-canada/ []
  9. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8039393/  []
  10. youtu.be/_SedlJMba3E?si=7tX511Zbc2lwQ2zF&t=124 []
  11. macdonaldlaurier.ca/how-gender-activists-stole-the-media-distorted-medicine-and-hurt-canadian-kids-mia-hughes-for-inside-policy []

This Post Has 20 Comments

  1. Louise Cote

    Congratulations, Carolyn! I am beyond thrilled to hear your message and to see you vindicated through the courts. Thank you for standing up for Canadian children and parents. 💜

    1. Carolyn Burjoski

      Thank you Louise!

  2. Dave Liderth

    Yes, Congratulations! Your courage and integrity are inspiring!

    And while your news is cause for celebration, my anger and frustration in realizing just how far we have fallen from social reality continues to intensify.

    I will share this news and your well documented experience with others in hopes that the truth will overtake the twisted, profit-centric push to mutilate and permanently harm our children.

    1. Carolyn Burjoski

      Thanks Dave. I appreciate your willingness to discuss this important topic with others in your social circle. So many people are afraid to simply say state what they actually think. The intimidation is intentional. Fear is how we got here. Courage is how we fix it

  3. O

    Congratulations! I’m sorry you had to be the one to endure this. This precedent must now be rammed through and the trans insanity ended.

    1. Carolyn Burjoski

      Thanks. It wasn’t fun, but parents supported my efforts so that’s how we won. The other educators speaking up also need to be supported, especially since the teachers unions aren’t focused on their primary mission anymore.

  4. Paul

    Hello Carolyn,

    Good news on your successful campaign to rid our schools of these insidious distractions hiding accountability for learning. I’m a retired (did some occasional during lockdown) teacher in Eastern Ontario.

    I was following these parasitic attacks and obstructions, sadly seeing one after the other get shamed and cancelled. Sue-Ann Levy highlighted your story, among countless others. Your trustees were completely out of control, advocating ridiculous ideas. Worse still it was spreading. Hey, if we can teach ideology, who cares about numeracy and literacy?
    It motivated me to start writing to trustees, MLA’s, etc.
    I also participated in a Bill 98 submission. Such hope but little follow-through for parents and accountability.
    The predatory sabotage of essential skills and learning in our schools continued.

    Right from the beginning, I’ve donated $100’s to your gofundme campaign. Sadly I decided to do so anonymously. No more.
    Now we seem to have a Minister who is at least talking about the decline in standards.

    I hope your “struggle against the machine” includes real consequences and accountability.

    Also that you are consulted by the Ministry going forward.
    (Hope springs eternal!)
    Thanks for your courage and advocacy. As they say, “sunlight is the best disinfectant.”

    Paul Keys

    Woke Watch Canada on Substack is another great source.

    1. Carolyn Burjoski

      Thanks Paul,
      I appreciate your encouragement and financial support. Like you, numerous good people have written articulate letters, delegations and articles, yet little has changed. These ideas have captured our institutions. Individuals promoting these falsehoods need to be freed from this destructive philosophy, which can only happen through calm conversations. I agree that using our real names instead of pseudonyms is the way forward, because it makes face to face conversations possible. But we do risk being mobbed and cancelled when we speak up so that’s why a network of support is essential. We have been building that together.

  5. Janet

    Thank you. It has been a challenging road to follow. My thought is that if a teacher says I was born in the wrong body I would reason that she was acknowledging that” I” existed prior to being born into any body. How can anyone know if that “I” cares which body, male of female, becomes its home for any particular lifetime?

    1. Carolyn Burjoski

      You rightly point out that gender ideology is a mystical quasi-religious belief. No child is born in the wrong body.

  6. Luciano Toscan

    Congratulations
    You are a true hero!!
    God bless you!!

    1. Carolyn Burjoski

      Thanks for all your support Luciano!

  7. Karmel Kingan

    Congratulations. And thank you so much for not giving up, like our elected officials wanted you to.
    My first instinct was to wonder about the terms of the settlement. And I suspect you were forced to sign a nondisclosure agreement … Which I think is terrible, given that these people are public officials. But on second thought I realize that part is personal to you …

    However, I would like to know if the taxpayers were the people who funded Kowski’s defence. And if the taxpayers paid the settlement, rather than the defendant/s.

    Can you at least tell us that much? Or tell us how we can find out?

    1. Carolyn Burjoski

      I do not know the answers to these questions in detail. I just asked AI but I’m not sure how it is applied in this particular circumstance. You could get some general answers with a search regarding Ontario school boards.

  8. Tom Kuntz

    Congratulations Carolyn. You are a warrior for truth and sanity.
    Ted and I are very proud to be your cousins.

    1. Carolyn Burjoski

      Thanks cousins!

  9. Celia McKew

    Thank you so much for your courage and tenacity. It’s been a long, difficult 4 years that would have just about broken you. We are all grateful that you held firm in your beliefs.
    Gender ideology is an evil that seems to have sucked commonsense, logic from so many intelligent people around the world. It’s a plague that must be stopped.
    Thank you.

  10. Carolyn Burjoski

    Thank you for your kind words.
    Gender Ideology is a lie that teaches children that they can “choose” if they are a boy, a girl or “something in between”. This incoherent philosophy is being pushed on our children and is causing them irreparable physical harm. The lawsuits are starting. A New York jury recently awarded $2 million in damages to a 22-year-old who argued that her medical team negligently facilitated a double mastectomy when she was 16 years old. It’s unfortunate that it will be because of these lawsuits, and not because of child safeguarding, that gender ideology will be removed from schools. Kids shouldn’t have to wait that long for common sense to return to our institutions.

  11. Christine

    Thank you for your courage in standing up for these children. I’m very glad that you were successful in your lawsuit. It’s discouraging seeing how these teachers, doctors and activists can’t see the harm that they are causing to these children (and as we’ve witnessed harm to others through/because of them).

    I also thank you for speaking truth about how you can’t fix the system from within. I home schooled my three kids. I started home schooling my oldest daughter in 1997 starting in grade four. In those days, I was just starting to see them introduce different kinds of family – that was enough for me (also there were bullying issues going on). I honestly didn’t see these gender identity issues coming back then. I went on to home school my youngest who are now 22 and almost 19 (she is still finishing up grade 12). It was because I wanted my children to be critical thinkers and I didn’t see that happening in the school system plus we wanted to pass on our values. We sacrificed a lot to do this but I have no regrets.

    We need more teachers (and others) to stand up for our children even at the great cost that you paid. It is much appreciated.

  12. Carolyn Burjoski

    Thank you! Homeschooling is definitely on the rise. I agree with you that ithe sacrifice that is worth it. I wonder if the end result of this crisis in education will be for parents to retake their role as the primary educators in new and creative ways.

Leave a Reply